Consuming my Religion
My friend, Mike Morrell ,invited me to respond to a post and I believe a series of posts he is processing this week on wonderings of post-charismatic/post-evangelical/quasi-orthodox/new-monastic practices. Here's where Mike is coming from:
"With that said, I’d like to see some post evangelical/charismatic engagements with East Orthodox spirituality–particularly hesychasm and the idea of theosis, or “divinization,” which I feel is a far sexier (or if that language offends you, more evocative) way of framing “sanctification” for the 21st century. Of course, there probably are just such works out there, and I’m just not familiar with ‘em–input, anyone?"
Here are my thoughts . . .
1. A critique:
First, the reason I put the Alanis video at the forefront on this post. Earlier this year for my doctorate program, we read Heath and Potter's "Nation of Rebels: Why Counterculture Became Consumer Culture" and chapter 9 is called "Thank you, India" and it was a jab at Alanis' famous song and it argued a perspective that really got me thinking. How ingrained is consumerism to us as westerners on this globe that we think all that is out there in any culture is for our picking and choosing for our individual desires and preferences? The world is our shopping aisle, find what suits us, find what tickles our fancy and gobble it up. Whatver gives us more pleasure, whatever makes us more happy, as consumers we are on the perpetual treadmill of desire. When it comes to post-whatever Christianity, emerging-whatever practices, we are actually good capitalists: we are wanting more and better and we'll seek the world to fleece it of its goods to suit our hyper-individualism (though we all crave more community). So, thank you, India (all 1.2 billion of you).
Is new-monasticism really anything like the aescetic monastic communities of the desert fathers in Africa of the first 4-5 centuries of the Church? Is it anything like their offpsring: the rugged culture of Celtic monasticism of the 5th, 6th and 7th centuries where the abbots, monks and teachers secluded themselves in the cleft of rock caves or abandoned themselves on islands like St. Cuthbert? Are they anything like the American versions of Trappist monasticism, like our beloved Abbey of Gethsemani in the rolling hills of Kentucky? 150 years ago, the first monks showed up on that land and began praying the 9 offices of prayer: Vigils, Lauds, Eucharist, Terce, Sext, None, Vespers, Rosary and Compline. Starts at 3:15 a.m. and ends at 7:30 p.m., other than that they work and eat meals together. Is our post-evangelical new-monasticism anything like that? Hardly from what I've seen and experienced. It appears more that we have found attraction in what they have done and are doing and borrow from it what works for us. We are not rooted in their traditions, nor are we submitting to their authority structures, we are consuming their religion and running with it on our terms.
In similar fashion with forms of eastern-orthodox, they in no way want to become an aisle we shop in for our religious consumer goods. Orthodoxy by definition is "right belief". Their epistemology is absolute. They fully reject any form or modernistic evangelicalism, let alone the postmodern forms of emerging post-evangelicals. Their orthodoxy is not a matter of relgious preference, it's a core part of being Ethiopian, Indian, Russian, Greek etc. One does not 'kind of' become orthodox or mix in some orthodoxy, you convert to the Orthodox Church and submitt to its authority, giving up your individualistic preferences. The mysteries of the faith are experienced and pursued within it's historic structures, creeds and ancient traditions, you can't buy a ticket for a one-time show. (Or I should say, it's not what they would affirm you to do.)
Having the opportunity this past September to be immersed in the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, meeting it's Patriarch Abune Paulos, listening to lectures from their seminary faculty, sharing meals with their theological staff and observing a service from a distance, I learned quite a bit. Introspectively, I was enamored with a faith that can literally takes it's history in the Scriptures to the Ethiopian Eunuch conversion in 34 A.D. to the Queen of Sheba and King Solomon of the Old Testament. At no time can I turn to my house church community and tell them to open to the part in the Bible where Ohio is mentioned. Being so de-traditioned in the West is a real weakness for us, particularly those of us who grew up in charismatic, non-denominational backgrounds. I think our affinity for these other cultures shows our desire for something like it. But are we ready to show up and stand outside the church mass at 5:30 a.m. and remain there for hours as a weekly part of worship, feeling unworthy to enter into the holy place? Are we ready to admitt our great spiritual need and organize our entire lives around it? Or does it depend on how late we stayed up watching Netflix? ;-)
2. A response:
This is not a critique of Mike, this is a critique of all of us in the West pursuing our faith recognizing the great shifts in culture, the great chasms within our evangelical/western experiences and our desire to follow Christ in Spirit and Truth. I am a huge fan of Celtic Christianity and have been deeply formed by practicing Celtic Daily Prayer from Northumbria Community on the coast of north England. Their holistic and right-brained approach to the faith connects with me. I have an Irish heritage and the poetry and contemplation leads me to a place of communion with Christ. However, how I lead that with my community in Ohio I'm sure looks nothing like what St. Patrick, St. Cuthbert or St. Columbanus ever had in mind. We are not a "Celtic Christian community". We are an American, suburban, missional-community of sorts that enjoys Celtic Christian heritage. In a way, we just consume of their religion. I read the desert monastic fathers because I learn so much from their godly leadership, their zeal for the Scriptures and their sacrifice to pursue the death of their flesh so that union with Christ might become more tangible. But are my spiritual disciplines anything that really reflects what their brand of true monasticism is? Not hardly. But I do learn simplicity from them, I learn to teach margins with my people so that we are more free to serve, love and pray. I learn that true spirituality, the disciplined kind, happens on purpose and with real intention. It's not when it pleases me or I prefer it, it's my chosen place of servitude for life. I pierce my ear to it's door and I choose no other Master than that of the risen Christ. That much I can learn from them.
The digital world has brought everything to our doorstep, I think that is a good thing. The fact that we not only 'know of' what the Church around the world is practicing, but that we can 'taste' of it is a real strength in our place and time. We recognize that we are drawn to the traditioned and mystical practices of others, it is revealing to us the fullness of our faith and what every tribe in the Kingdom is experiencing. My only warning is, let's be very careful to not co-opt something sacred in another for our own consumption. (I know I do this, have done this, and I'm just trying to be aware of my own consumerism daily.)
We harsly critique the colonialism and imperialism of our missionary heritage in the West, let's recognize we can do the same when we practice the consuming of other religious cultures by putting our desires and appetites for something new and cool above the submission of their sacred traditions. Wherever the thin space is between being learners as opposed to consumers, let's live there.
Dear India, thank you but I'm sorry we assumed it was all about us. We are still trying to learn who we are.
